The far-right just lost. Twice.

• Today, Explained newsletter

The far-right just lost. Twice.

In Serbia and Brazil, huge numbers of voters turned out on Sunday to repudiate right-wing populists.

byCaitlin DeweyOct 26, 2026, 9:55 PM UTC

Milos Milanovic/AFP via Getty ImagesCaitlin Deweyis a senior writer and editor at Vox, where she helms the Today, Explained newsletter.

This story appeared in Today, Explained, a daily newsletter that helps you understand the most compelling news and stories of the day. Subscribe here.

Vox isn’t typically in the business of covering elections in far-flung locales like the central Balkans. (No offense whatsoever to anyone from the central Balkans!) But on Sunday, an insurgent student-backed movement in Serbia successfully toppled the country’s ruling right-wing political machine, creating an unexpected opening for democratic reform.

Then, in another upset halfway around the globe, Brazilian voters reelected incumbent President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva over his far-right challenger, Flávio Bolsonaro. “Democracy always, dictatorship never again,” Lula said in his victory speech.

That’s two big repudiations of the nationalist right in 24 hours. Not quite enough to declare a trend, maybe, but sufficient to remind us that there’s still hope for the world’s embattled democratic institutions.

More than that, these results offer evidence of something that sounds naive and Pollyannish in our current moment, but can (apparently!) still prove true: Organizing can be a powerful force for electoral change — both abroad and maybe here at home.

Go a little deeper

To be fair, the two elections differed considerably, and I don’t want to suggest it’s all sunshine and democratic renewal ahead for Brazil and Serbia. Bolsonaro is refusing to concede, for instance. And in Serbia, the victorious Student List still has to stand up a government, a prime minister, and a full policy platform — something the nascent movement has never done before.

But academics and elections-watchers in both countries have credited the results in large part to mass protests and grassroots organizing that helped mobilize unexpected numbers of voters.

Serbian students began their movement in 2024, following the partial collapse of a railway station that killed 16 people. The government’s failure to fully explain the cause of the collapse — or hold anyone responsible — fueled months of marches, protest bike rides, and other demonstrations. That movement eventually grew into the Student List: an opposition electoral slate that fielded 250 candidates in Sunday’s parliamentary elections.

The story in Brazil is quite different. Lula, the country’s leftist president, was actually poised to lose. Brazil uses a two-round popular vote to elect its president, and if no candidate secures more than half the vote in the first round, then the top two candidates proceed to a runoff election. Lula placed second in that first vote, after Flávio Bolsonaro, the son of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro and the heir to his father’s far-right political movement.

To many Brazilians, that second-place finish served as a kind of wake-up call. “No runoff campaign in Brazil has ever brought so many people to the streets and onto social media,” Guilherme Casarões, an associate professor of Brazilian studies at Florida International University, wrote in an analysis of the surprise results. One WhatsApp channel dedicated to turning voters out for Lula grew to nearly 11 million followers, up from just 50,000 after his first-round loss.

Looking at these projects abroad, I’m struck that American pro-democracy movements like No Kings haven’t achieved that kind of influence. Arguably, that’s in part a consequence of their failure to turn protest energy into actual political organizing — things like registering voters, knocking on doors, and fielding candidates.

But there are some signs that may be shifting. No Kings has lately pivoted its focus, for instance, from mostly organizing protests to urging Americans — of both parties — to vote in the midterms. And Indivisible, one of the groups behind the movement, claims that early voting surged during the latest protests in the zip codes where they occurred.

It’s not exactly a central Balkan moment, but maybe it’s a hint of things to come. Elections can surprise you, after all. Just ask a Serb or a Brazilian.

One link for later

➨ Leave your big life decisions to chance. (Sort of.) A team of researchers invited people to make a big life decision by flipping a coin and then tracked their happiness with the outcome. They found that, of the people who obeyed the results of the toss, the ones who changed something big were overwhelmingly happier. That doesn’t literally mean we should all resort to coin tosses, but it should tell us something important: We often tend to be too cautious about making major changes.

Before you go…

• Did you know…that in the 1870s and ’80s, spectators flocked to Madison Square Garden for long-distance walking competitions? Athletes walked up to 600 miles in six days, just going round and round the stadium.
• Today’s trivia: Which New Jersey city was the first predominantly white community in the US to vote in favor of school integration? (You can find this and other brain puzzles in Vox’s daily crossword. Look for the answer in tomorrow’s edition.)
• Yesterday’s trivia: Last week we asked you for the radioactive noble gas with the chemical symbol Rn. That would be radon, once a trendy (deadly) ingredient in quack medicines.

See More:

• Politics
• Today, Explained newsletter
• World Politics

Most Popular

1. Take a mental break with the newest Vox crossword
2. The Supreme Court is poised to make taxpayers fund anti-LGBTQ discrimination
3. Benjamin Netanyahu’s day of reckoning is here
4. Is the “good” AI company actually making everything worse?
5. Trump’s vicious closing message in Michigan

Advertiser Content From

This is the title for the native ad

More in Today, Explained newsletter

Benjamin Netanyahu’s day of reckoning is hereHow worried should I be about the AI hacking panic and “Black October”?Would a Democratic Congress change course on Israel?The ugliest political ad of 2026 (so far)Is the US abandoning Ukraine?The French youth revoltToday, Explained newsletterOct 27Today, Explained newsletterOct 27Benjamin Netanyahu’s day of reckoning is here

Israelis turned out in record numbers for an election that could decide the future of their democracy.

By Caitlin DeweyToday, Explained newsletterOct 23Today, Explained newsletterOct 23How worried should I be about the AI hacking panic and “Black October”?

Whether the cyber-pocalypse is here or not, it’s time to change your passwords.

By Cameron Peters and Adam Clark EstesToday, Explained newsletterOct 22Today, Explained newsletterOct 22Would a Democratic Congress change course on Israel?

Public opinion on Israel has changed. But it doesn’t rank among most voters’ top midterm priorities.

By Caitlin DeweyToday, Explained newsletterOct 21Today, Explained newsletterOct 21The ugliest political ad of 2026 (so far)

Ohio gubernatorial candidate Vivek Ramaswamy doesn’t care if you think his latest attack ad is too vicious.

By Caitlin DeweyToday, Explained newsletterOct 20Today, Explained newsletterOct 20Is the US abandoning Ukraine?

Vladimir Putin wants Ukraine. Donald Trump wants cheaper gas.

By Caitlin DeweyToday, Explained newsletterOct 19Today, Explained newsletterOct 19The French youth revolt

Nobody protests quite like the French.

By Caitlin DeweyAdvertiser Content From

This is the title for the native ad